Domain Risk HeatMap

Favicon for susaron.es

susaron.es

9/23/2026, 1:46:54 PM

10/10 tests performed · 9 issues reported
Critical 0High 3Low 6

Not detectedMissing step
drag, scroll, click a node

Indicators

Restricted information

Some findings are hidden in this public report because they may include technical details that could facilitate abuse, competitor action, or unnecessary security and reputational exposure. Verify domain ownership to unlock the full report.

High

Details are protected until domain ownership is verified to avoid exposing sensitive technical information publicly

High

Details are protected until domain ownership is verified to avoid exposing sensitive technical information publicly

High

Details are protected until domain ownership is verified to avoid exposing sensitive technical information publicly

Low

domain-profile › El dominio publica DMARC, pero la política no está en modo de aplicación

Hay DMARC, pero todavía no bloquea la suplantación: sirve para observar, no para proteger.

DomainEmailDNS
Solution:

Endurece la política de forma progresiva:

  1. Confirma que SPF y DKIM están bien configurados y alineados.
  2. Activa los informes agregados (rua) y revísalos unas semanas.
  3. Pasa de p=none a p=quarantine y finalmente a p=reject.
Low

headers-security › The X-Content-Type-Options header is missing, so browsers are not explicitly instructed to follow declared MIME types.

This is usually a low-severity issue, but it can contribute to avoidable browser-side risk if files are served with incorrect content types. It weakens the site’s security hygiene and should be corrected as part of standard hardening.

WebsiteServer
Solution:

Configure the following header on all relevant responses:

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

Technical checks:

  • Ensure JavaScript files are served with a valid JavaScript MIME type.
  • Ensure CSS files are served as text/css.
  • Ensure JSON, images, fonts and downloadable files have correct Content-Type values.
  • Apply the header consistently through the web server, CDN or reverse proxy.
  • Re-test static assets and API responses after deployment.
Low

headers-security › The website does not send X-Frame-Options to restrict whether its pages can be embedded by other websites.

If no equivalent CSP `frame-ancestors` protection is present, attackers may be able to embed pages in deceptive interfaces and attempt clickjacking attacks. This can affect account actions, forms, key user steps or customer trust.

WebsiteServer
Solution:

Configure framing protection using Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors where possible, and optionally keep X-Frame-Options for legacy compatibility.

Preferred modern control:

Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self'

Or, if the site must not be framed at all:

Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none'

Legacy-compatible header:

X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

Or stricter:

X-Frame-Options: DENY

Technical checks:

  • Use SAMEORIGIN if legitimate same-origin embedding is needed.
  • Use DENY if the site should never be embedded.
  • Do not use ALLOW-FROM; it is obsolete and ignored by modern browsers.
  • If CSP frame-ancestors is already correctly configured, treat missing XFO as a lower-priority compatibility issue.
  • Validate embedded widgets, admin panels, previews and embedded flows before enforcing DENY.
Low

headers-security › No explicit Referrer Policy is configured to control how much URL information is shared when visitors navigate to external resources.

External services may receive more referral information than necessary, including page paths or campaign context depending on browser behavior and destination. This creates unnecessary privacy and information-disclosure exposure.

WebsiteServer
Solution:

Configure an explicit Referrer-Policy header.

Recommended balanced option:

Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Stricter option:

Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

Technical guidance:

  • Use strict-origin-when-cross-origin for most commercial websites.
  • Use no-referrer where maximum privacy is required.
  • Avoid unsafe-url, because it can disclose full URLs to external destinations.
  • Avoid placing sensitive data, tokens, emails or identifiers in URLs.
  • Validate analytics, attribution and affiliate tracking before choosing a stricter policy.
Low

info-exposure › Response header x-powered-by discloses software version information: PHP/8.3.32, PleskLin, PleskLin

The response header discloses software version information. This is not a vulnerability by itself, but it gives attackers additional context to fingerprint the stack and compare the detected version against known weaknesses. The business risk increases if the disclosed software is outdated, unsupported, or affected by known vulnerabilities.

WebsiteServer
Solution:

Reduce unnecessary software version disclosure in HTTP response headers.

Recommended actions:

  1. Identify the component exposing the version through the x-powered-by header.

    Example:

    curl -I https://example.com
    
  2. Disable or minimize version disclosure.

    Nginx:

    server_tokens off;
    

    Apache:

    ServerTokens Prod
    ServerSignature Off
    

    PHP:

    expose_php = Off
    
  3. If the header is generated by a framework, CMS, proxy, CDN, or plugin, remove or override the version at that layer.

  4. Keep generic product disclosure only where operationally required.

    Prefer:

    Server: nginx
    

    Instead of:

    Server: nginx/1.18.0
    
  5. Validate the result after deployment:

    curl -I https://example.com
    
  6. Do not rely on header hiding as a security control. Also verify that the disclosed component is updated, supported, and not affected by known vulnerabilities.

Low

asset-optimization › Mixed image format usage detected: 124 modern image(s) and 105 JPEG/PNG/GIF image(s)

Some detected images are still served in less efficient formats. This may increase page weight and slow visual loading, especially on mobile or slower connections. The real business impact depends on image size, compression, placement, and whether those images affect the initial loading experience.

Website
Solution:

Progressively migrate the remaining images to modern formats, prioritizing the assets with the highest impact on initial loading.

Technical recommendations:

  • Identify the JPEG/PNG/GIF images with the largest transferred size.
  • Prioritize above-the-fold images, hero images, banners, carousels, content images, and category images.
  • Convert suitable images to WebP or AVIF while preserving equivalent visual quality.
  • Use the <picture> element when fallback support is required:
    <picture>
      <source srcset="/image.avif" type="image/avif">
      <source srcset="/image.webp" type="image/webp">
      <img src="/image.jpg" alt="Image description">
    </picture>
    
  • If the site uses WordPress or another CMS/site platform, check whether the CMS, theme, optimization plugin, CDN, or image service supports automatic WebP/AVIF generation.
  • Verify that the converted images are actually delivered in the final HTML or through the CDN, not only generated on the server.
  • Keep PNG where it is technically justified, for example for complex transparency or specific graphic assets, but optimize file size.
  • Review real displayed dimensions: avoid serving 2000 px images when they are displayed at 400 px.
  • After migration, measure total page weight, LCP, and mobile loading behavior.
Info

headers-security › No active web application firewall or bot protection signal was detected from response headers or content

This is not necessarily a problem: many legitimate sites operate without a dedicated WAF and rely on other controls. This check only looks for signals of an active protection mode (challenge pages, bot-management cookies). The site may still sit behind a CDN or proxy (e.g. Cloudflare, Sucuri) with WAF capabilities available but not actively challenging this request, which this passive check cannot confirm either way.

WebsiteWAF
Info

seo-basics › Incomplete Open Graph metadata detected (missing: og:image)

When Open Graph metadata is incomplete, social platforms and messaging apps may generate fallback previews. This can produce inconsistent titles, weak descriptions or unattractive images when users share the page.

WebsiteSEO
Solution:

Complete the missing Open Graph tags inside the document <head>.

Recommended implementation:

<meta property="og:title" content="Page title for social sharing">
<meta property="og:description" content="Short, compelling description for social sharing">
<meta property="og:image" content="https://example.com/path/to/image.jpg">

Technical checks:

  • Use an absolute URL for og:image.
  • Recommended image size: at least 1200x630 px.
  • Ensure the image URL returns HTTP 200.
  • Ensure the image is crawlable and not blocked by authentication or robots rules.
  • Keep og:title and og:description aligned with the visible page content.
  • Use page-specific values for content pages, categories and landing pages.
  • Ensure the tags are present in the initial HTML response.
  • Test previews in major social and messaging platforms after deployment.
Info

accessibility-basics › 11 of 134 link(s) or button(s) have no accessible text

Links or buttons with no visible text, aria-label or title are announced as empty or generic by screen readers (for example, just \"link\" or \"button\"), making them unusable for assistive technology users. This is common in icon-only buttons and image links.

WebsiteAccessibility
Solution:

Provide an accessible name for every interactive link and button.

Recommended implementation:

<a href="/account" aria-label="View account">
  <svg aria-hidden="true">...</svg>
</a>

<button aria-label="Close dialog">×</button>

Technical checks:

  • Prefer visible text content over aria-label when possible.
  • For icon-only controls, add aria-label or visually hidden text.
  • Ensure decorative icons inside the control use aria-hidden="true".
  • Avoid generic labels such as "click here" or "read more" without context.
  • Re-test with a screen reader or accessibility browser extension.
Info

info-exposure › No security.txt vulnerability reporting file detected

The website does not publish a standard security contact file. This is not a vulnerability by itself, but it may make it harder for researchers or third parties to report security issues responsibly. In practice, this can delay remediation of problems that may affect customer trust, service availability, or business reputation.

DomainWebsite
Solution:

Publish a security.txt file with a clear vulnerability reporting process.

Recommended actions:

  1. Create the file at the standard location:

    https://example.com/.well-known/security.txt
    
  2. Include at least a valid contact method.

    Example:

    Contact: mailto:security@example.com
    Preferred-Languages: en, es
    Canonical: https://example.com/.well-known/security.txt
    
  3. Optional but recommended fields:

    Policy: https://example.com/security-policy
    Acknowledgments: https://example.com/security-acknowledgments
    Expires: 2027-12-31T23:59:59Z
    
  4. Make sure the contact mailbox is monitored.

  5. Define an internal triage process:

    • Who receives the report
    • Who validates the issue
    • Expected response time
    • Escalation path for critical vulnerabilities
    • Criteria for coordinated disclosure
  6. Verify publication:

    curl -I https://example.com/.well-known/security.txt
    curl https://example.com/.well-known/security.txt
    
Info

dns-email-reputation › No validated DNSSEC delegation was found for the domain: No DS records in the parent zone

DNS responses for this domain cannot be cryptographically validated, leaving some exposure to DNS spoofing or cache poisoning in vulnerable network paths. This is a common configuration across the web and is rarely a critical issue on its own, but enabling DNSSEC adds a meaningful layer of trust for domains handling logins or sensitive customer data.

DomainDNS
Solution:

Enable DNSSEC signing for the domain.

Recommended technical actions:

  1. Confirm DNSSEC support with the current DNS hosting provider or registrar.
  2. Enable DNSSEC signing on the authoritative DNS zone.
  3. Publish the resulting DS record with the domain registrar so the parent zone can delegate trust.
  4. Verify propagation and validate the chain of trust with an external DNSSEC validation tool.
  5. Monitor key rotation schedules if the provider does not automate them.
Info

legal-compliance › Known tracking services detected: ["Google Analytics / GA4", "Google Ads / DoubleClick", "Google Fonts (GDPR risk)", "reCAPTCHA", "TikTok Pixel", "Hotjar", "Mailchimp", "Cookiebot", "Didomi"]

These services are commonly used for analytics, advertising, attribution, personalisation or behaviour measurement. This indicator is informational; privacy and compliance impact depends on the service purpose, configuration, consent behaviour, data sharing model and applicable jurisdiction.

WebsiteLegal

What to do now?

Choose the option that best fits your situation.

Free

Fix it in-house

Ideal if you have a developer, agency, or technical team available.

  • Prioritised action plan.
  • Explanation of each issue.
  • Step-by-step remediation guide.
Recommended

Request an advanced audit

Recommended if the site generates significant revenue or you need complete information to decide.

  • Manually verifies all findings.
  • Rules out false positives.
  • Analyses configurations that cannot be checked automatically.
  • Evaluates platform-specific risks (Shopify, WooCommerce, PrestaShop, Magento…).
  • Prioritises issues by business impact.
  • Delivers an executive report and remediation plan.
15 min

Not sure what to do?

Request a 15-minute review where we will analyse your audit results and tell you:

  • Which issues are genuinely important.
  • Which ones can wait.
  • Which are likely false positives.
  • The most cost-effective way to resolve them.

What is behind this report?

Built to detect the kind of issues that silently affect sales, trust, checkout confidence, campaign performance, and operational continuity.

  • A system designed to prevent your website and digital marketing from failing.
  • A team with over 25 years of experience building digital projects for businesses.
  • Thousands of automated audits run during platform training and validation.
  • Dozens of technical indicators analysed on every execution.
  • Multiple data sources combined — DNS, TLS, HTTP, performance, reputation, email, legal compliance, SEO, and more.
  • AI specialised in interpreting business impact, not just technical results.

About this audit

This report is provided for informational and prioritisation purposes only. It reflects automated observations obtained from publicly available information at the time of analysis. The findings are not definitive proof of a vulnerability, legal breach, security incident, performance failure, reputational damage, or business loss. They highlight indicators that may deserve review because improving them can help reduce exposure, strengthen digital operations, and support customer trust. Risk estimates are decision-support indicators, not predictions of specific events. Automated analysis cannot verify every technical, legal, operational, or business context. Expert review may be required to validate results, rule out false positives, and determine actual impact before making significant remediation or compliance decisions.